This Blog was created as a hub of information for shareholders and employees of public company Cyanotech Corporation. It is provided as a free of charge public service to investors. The basic idea is:

  1. We own Cyanotech stock (Nasdaq: CYAN)
  2. We believe CYAN stock is significantly undervalued relative to its potential
  3. Obvious Cconflicts of Interest and other disturbing facts have been discovered relating to “Chairman for Life” Michael Arlen Davis and his hand-picked Board of Directors
  4. Chairman Davis’ activities around Cyanotech appear to be the principal cause of the company’s present day problems.
As Chairman of the Board of Directors of a public company, Michael Arlen Davis (MAD) is, ipso facto, a Public Figure. As Directors of a public company, Cyanotech’s individual board members are also, ipso facto, Public Figures. Moreover, these Public Figures are up for re-election at Cyanotech’s August 2017 annual meeting of shareholders. 

With the intent of a spirited political campaign, Images are used throughout this Blog as "Thumb Nails” and/or “Click Bait" to attract investor and employee readership to the much more sober (e.g. sometimes boring) but more factual written word content. 

The Images are creative devices, not declarative statements of fact. Images are intentionally irreverent, over-the-top exaggerations,” obvious hyperbole, and obvious "political" satire given anticipated Board elections at the company's annual meeting in August.  

Rudolf Steiner Foundation has also earned treatment as a "Public Figure" by participating in an undisclosed (until recently) investment “Group” formed with their longtime close associate and --Significant Donor -- Chairman Davis, to pursue investment activities in and around the publicly traded shares of Cyanotech.

The images are simple creative devices that represent a relatively tiny portion of the total information provided, particularly when compared to the much larger volume of articulated research and other written word content offered freely to investors and employees, as a public service, and in the sincere interest of improving Cyanotech’s corporate governance practices and share price performance. No image used in this Blog should be viewed in any way as a declarative statement of fact about Chairman Davis, Cyanotech's Board of Directors, and/or Rudolf Steiner Foundation.

Note that this Blog employs, for example, images of North Korean Dictator Kim Jong Un as a metaphor for general themes such as inherited power, compulsive secrecy, and desire to control. Please note also that the public record reinforces that Michael Arlen Davis shares his controversial father Leonard’s passion for secrecy and control.

To illustrate further, consider, for example,  the images below of a very young and vibrant Kim Jong Un, and his loving father Kim Jong Il, the previous Dictator of North Korea.  If these images were employed in an article as a metaphor for the father/son relationship between Leonard and Michael Davis, reasonable people would appreciate the obvious absurdity and humorous Intent of the images. In fact, reasonable people would likely view comparisons of most public figures to the Kim's as "wild exaggerations" and "obvious hyperbole". that also contain elements of general truth -- e.g. they are a father and son, they are known to like secrecy, they appear like being in power a lot,  and they are generally known to not take kindly to any evidence of disloyalty, or opposition.

Obvious Hyperbole

No reasonable person should view any images in this micro-cap company shareholder Blog as suggesting Michael Arlen Davis and/or his associates have any blood on their hands. MAD may be a significant risk to shareholders' wallets, but he is not a threat to world peace. MAD is not seeking to possess nuclear weapons, that we know of, and we promise to report back if we see any evidence of that changing ;-)

The images used in this Blog/Website are no more than creative devices used to attract interest to our reporting of relevant criticism, comment, news, teaching, and research to shareholders and employees of Cyanotech Corporation, related to its Public Company Chairman and Public Company Board of Directors. 


This site is for educational purposes only!!

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship.  It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test.  The term “fair use” originated in the United States.  A similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions.  Civil law jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright. 

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords.  This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U.S. Code).  One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use”.  The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law. 

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.  Section 107 also sets out in four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
  1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
  2. The nature of the copyrighted work
  3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
  4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.
The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.

The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.

When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.


No warranties

This website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied. This website’s operators, authors and participants (e.g. “Operators”) make no representations or warranties in relation to this website or the information and materials provided on this website.

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing paragraph, The Operators do not warrant that:

--this website will be constantly available, or available at all; or the information on this website is complete, true, accurate or non-misleading.
--Nothing on this website constitutes, or is meant to constitute, advice of any kind. [If     you require advice in relation to any [legal, financial or medical] matter you should  consult an appropriate professional.]

Limitations of liability

The Operators will not be liable to you (whether under the law of contract, the law of torts or otherwise) in relation to the contents of, or use of, or otherwise in connection with, this website:

--[to the extent that the website is provided free-of-charge, for any direct loss;]
--for any indirect, special or consequential loss; or
--for any business losses, loss of revenue, income, profits or anticipated savings, loss of contracts or business relationships, loss of reputation or goodwill, or loss or corruption of information or data.

These limitations of liability apply even if the Operators have been expressly advised of the potential loss.


Nothing in this website disclaimer will exclude or limit any warranty implied by law that it would be unlawful to exclude or limit; and nothing in this website disclaimer will exclude or limit the Operators liability in respect of any:

--death or personal injury caused by the Operators negligence;
--fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of the Operators; or
--matter which it would be illegal or unlawful for the Operators to exclude or limit, or to --attempt or purport to exclude or limit, its liability.


By using this website, you agree that the exclusions and limitations of liability set out in this website disclaimer are reasonable.  

If you do not think they are reasonable, you must not use this website.